Seat Leon II (1P) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Seat Leon II (1P) · Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSIvsSeat Leon IV 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon IV
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range820 km509 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed233 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,382kg3,047lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 82.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 31.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 820km509mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,323mm170in | 4,368mm172in |
| Width | 1,768mm70in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,458mm57in | 1,456mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,686mm106in |
| Front track | 1,527mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | - |
| Trunk volume | 341L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,166L | 1,301L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 174g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 31.8 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI has 21 hp more than Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 7.1 s |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI and Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI and Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 733 km 456 mi |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.1 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon II (1P)Facelift 2009FR 2.0 TFSI | SeatLeon IV2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 233 km/h 145 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,382 kg 3,047 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 820 km 509 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 174 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 341 L 12.0 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI | Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon II (1P) Facelift 2009 FR 2.0 TFSI
- Has 21 hp more
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Seat Leon IV 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 86 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























