Seat Leon II (1P)
Car comparison
Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSIvsSeat Leon III · Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Leon III · Facelift 2016
FR 1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI
- Lightest1,252 kg2,760 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions134 g/km
- Best estimated range862 km536 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,369kg3,018lb | 1,252kg2,760lb |
| Gross weight | 1,939kg4,275lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 33.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 705km438mi Calculated | 862km536mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,323mm170in | 4,281mm169in |
| Width | 1,768mm70in | 1,816mm71in |
| Height | 1,458mm57in | 1,444mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,634mm104in |
| Front track | 1,527mm60in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 341L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,210L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 33.0 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSI has 20 hp more than Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI and Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 1,369 kg 3,018 lb |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 1,252 kg 2,760 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 7.2 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI and Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSI: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 705 km 438 mi |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 862 km 536 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.2 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon II (1P)FR 2.0 TFSI | SeatLeon IIIFacelift 2016FR 1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,369 kg 3,018 lb | 1,252 kg 2,760 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 705 km 438 mi | 862 km 536 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 341 L 12.0 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSI | Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon II (1P) FR 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Leon III Facelift 2016 FR 1.8 TSI
- Is 117 kg lighter
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Has 39 L more trunk volume
- Emits 75 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























