Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007
Car comparison
Volvo V50 · Facelift 2007 2.5 T5vsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight161 hp/t120 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score54/100
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range886 km551 mi
- Largest trunk442 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 28.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 653km406mi Calculated | 886km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,522mm178in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,770mm70in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,531mm60in | 1,523mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 417L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,307L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 227g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 has 30 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 653 km 406 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 886 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5 | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 653 km 406 mi | 886 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 227 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 417 L 14.7 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 161 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5 | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V50 Facelift 2007 2.5 T5
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 233 km (145 mi) more estimated range
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























