Scion FR-S
Car comparison
Scion FR-S 2.0vsSeat Ibiza IV SC · Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Ibiza IV SC · Facelift 2015
Cupra 1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Largest trunk292 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Scion FR-S 2.0
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | ScionFR-S2.0 | SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 205Nm151lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,251kg2,758lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 76.5s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.4s Calculated | 27.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated | 270Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 641km398mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,234mm167in | 4,055mm160in |
| Width | 1,775mm70in | 1,693mm67in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,420mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,469mm97in |
| Front track | 1,519mm60in | 1,449mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | 1,441mm57in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 195L | 292L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 45L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Scion FR-S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7,000 rpm | 6,400-6,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 4,300-6,200 rpm | 1,450-4,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ScionFR-S2.0 | SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.4 s | 27.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 192 hp 143 kW |
Scion FR-S 2.0 has 8 hp more than Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI and Scion FR-S 2.0: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 1,251 kg 2,758 lb |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7.6 s |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 6.7 s |
Although Scion FR-S 2.0 has more power, Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI and Scion FR-S 2.0: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI and Scion FR-S 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 641 km 398 mi |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ScionFR-S2.0 | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ScionFR-S2.0 | SeatIbiza IV SCFacelift 2015Cupra 1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,251 kg 2,758 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 641 km 398 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 195 L 6.9 cu ft | 292 L 10.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Scion FR-S 2.0 | Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Scion FR-S 2.0
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Seat Ibiza IV SC Facelift 2015 Cupra 1.8 TSI
- Has 115 Nm more
- Is 66 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 109 km (68 mi) more estimated range
- Has 97 L more trunk volume
- Emits 42 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























