Renault Talisman Estate
Car comparison
Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCivsSkoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Superb III Combi
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight122 hp/t91 kW/t8.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best estimated range1,269 km789 mi
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,638kg3,611lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,241kg4,941lb | 2,325kg5,126lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.4s Calculated | 37.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,041km647mi Calculated | 1,269km789mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,866mm192in | 4,856mm191in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,477mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,809mm111in | 2,841mm112in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 148mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 503L | 660L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,681L | 1,950L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.4 s | 37.1 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 11.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi has 10 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 1,638 kg 3,611 lb |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 9.0 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 8.1 s |
Although Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi has more power, Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 1,041 km 647 mi |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 1,269 km 789 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 200 hp 149 kW | 9.0 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultTalisman Estate2.0 Blue dCi | SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,638 kg 3,611 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,041 km 647 mi | 1,269 km 789 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi | Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Talisman Estate 2.0 Blue dCi
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
- Is 28 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 228 km (142 mi) more estimated range
- Has 157 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























