Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSIvsRenault Talisman Estate 1.8 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Talisman Estate
1.8 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed247 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,367 kg3,014 lb
- Best power-to-weight168 hp/t125 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,367kg3,014lb | 1,514kg3,338lb |
| Gross weight | 1,933kg4,262lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.5s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 168hp/t125kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,689mm185in | 4,866mm192in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,870mm74in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,809mm111in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 127mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 503L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,681L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Talisman Estate 1.8 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 4,700-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 5,200 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 102 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 225 hp 168 kW |
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI has 5 hp more than Renault Talisman Estate 1.8 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Talisman Estate 1.8 TCe and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 1,367 kg 3,014 lb |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 1,514 kg 3,338 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 6.8 s |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI and Renault Talisman Estate 1.8 TCe: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | 230 hp 172 kW | 6.8 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | 225 hp 168 kW | 7.5 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 2017RS 2.0 TSI | RenaultTalisman Estate1.8 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 247 km/h 153 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,367 kg 3,014 lb | 1,514 kg 3,338 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 503 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 168 hp/t 125 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 RS 2.0 TSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 147 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Renault Talisman Estate 1.8 TCe
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























