Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T4vsRenault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Talisman
1.6 Energy TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk608 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,549kg3,415lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,030kg4,475lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,164km723mi Calculated | 911km566mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,849mm191in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,868mm74in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,463mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,808mm111in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,614mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 608L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,022L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 157 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 200 hp 149 kW |
Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe has 10 hp more than Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 1,549 kg 3,415 lb |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 7.2 s |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 7.6 s |
Although Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe has more power, Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 and Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 911 km 566 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T4 | RenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,549 kg 3,415 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,164 km 723 mi | 911 km 566 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 608 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4 | Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T4
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Talisman 1.6 Energy TCe
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 119 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 228 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























