Renault Megane IV
Car comparison
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8vsToyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Yaris (XP210)
GR 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque390 Nm288 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range658 km409 mi
- Largest trunk294 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Lightest1,305 kg2,877 lb
- Best power-to-weight200 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 261hp195kW |
| Torque | 390Nm288lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,460kg3,219lb | 1,305kg2,877lb |
| Gross weight | 1,930kg4,255lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 57.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.0s Calculated | 23.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 610km379mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,372mm172in | 3,995mm157in |
| Width | 1,874mm74in | 1,805mm71in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,455mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,669mm105in | 2,560mm101in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,536mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,596mm63in | 1,572mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 101mm4in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 294L | 207L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,157L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane IV RS 1.8: Power / Torque
- Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,000-4,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.0 s | 23.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 261 hp 195 kW |
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 has 19 hp more than Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6 and Renault Megane IV RS 1.8: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 5.8 s |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 5.5 s |
Although Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 has more power, Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6 and Renault Megane IV RS 1.8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 and Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 658 km 409 mi |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 610 km 379 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 261 hp 195 kW | 5.5 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | ToyotaYaris (XP210)GR 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 261 hp 195 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 229 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,460 kg 3,219 lb | 1,305 kg 2,877 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 610 km 379 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 294 L 10.4 cu ft | 207 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 | Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 31 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Has 87 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Toyota Yaris (XP210) GR 1.6
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























