Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 · Facelift 2016 1.5 T3vsRenault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane IV
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Most powerful160 hp119 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Lightest1,378 kg3,038 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t87 kW/t8.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk407 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,051 km653 mi
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 152hp113kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,531kg3,375lb | 1,378kg3,038lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,839kg4,054lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.1s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.9s Calculated | 61.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,051km653mi Calculated | 862km536mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,359mm172in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,439mm57in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,669mm105in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 407L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,247L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,800-4,020 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.9 s | 61.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW |
Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe has 8 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3 and Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 1,531 kg 3,375 lb |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 8.3 s |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe and Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 1,051 km 653 mi |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 862 km 536 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.2 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40Facelift 20161.5 T3 | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 152 hp 113 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,531 kg 3,375 lb | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,051 km 653 mi | 862 km 536 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 407 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3 | Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 1.5 T3
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 189 km (117 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 153 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























