Renault Megane IV
Car comparison
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8vsRenault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane III Coupe
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed255 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque390 Nm288 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
- Lightest1,387 kg3,058 lb
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk377 L
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 390Nm288lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,437kg3,168lb | 1,387kg3,058lb |
| Gross weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.5s Calculated | 24.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 625km388mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,372mm172in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,874mm74in | - |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,435mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,669mm105in | 2,636mm104in |
| Front track | 1,615mm64in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,596mm63in | 1,545mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 101mm4in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 294L | 377L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,157L | 1,024L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane IV RS 1.8: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.5 s | 24.2 s |
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 162 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 250 hp 186 kW |
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 has 30 hp more than Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V and Renault Megane IV RS 1.8: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 5.8 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 6.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 and Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 625 km 388 mi |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.8 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IVRS 1.8 | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 390 Nm 288 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 255 km/h 158 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,437 kg 3,168 lb | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 625 km 388 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 294 L 10.4 cu ft | 377 L 13.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane IV RS 1.8 | Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane IV RS 1.8
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























