Renault Megane III Coupe
Car comparison
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16VvsRenault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane IV
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
- Lightest1,378 kg3,038 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range862 km536 mi
- Largest trunk407 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque340 Nm251 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight180 hp/t134 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,387kg3,058lb | 1,378kg3,038lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,839kg4,054lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.0s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.6s Calculated | 61.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 862km536mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,359mm172in |
| Width | 1,848mm73in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,435mm56in | 1,447mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,669mm105in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,545mm61in | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 377L | 407L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,024L | 1,247L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 190g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.6 s | 61.3 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 250 hp 186 kW |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW |
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V has 90 hp more than Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe and Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 6.1 s |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V and Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe: 2.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe and Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 714 km 444 mi |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 862 km 536 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.1 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.2 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane III CoupeRS 2.0 16V | RenaultMegane IV1.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | 1,378 kg 3,038 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 862 km 536 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 190 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 377 L 13.3 cu ft | 407 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V | Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane III Coupe RS 2.0 16V
- Has 90 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane IV 1.3 TCe
- Is 9 kg lighter
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 148 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























