Volkswagen Scirocco III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSIvsRenault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II)
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight165 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range714 km444 mi
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,373kg3,027lb | 1,355kg2,987lb |
| Gross weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.8s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.0s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,256mm168in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,404mm55in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 292L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 755L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 5,190 rpm | 1,610 rpm | 5,440 rpm |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.0 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V has 24 hp more than Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI and Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 658 km 409 mi |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenScirocco III2.0 TSI | RenaultMegane II Coupe (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,373 kg 3,027 lb | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 292 L 10.3 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI | Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Scirocco III 2.0 TSI
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Megane II Coupe (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 24 hp more
- Is 18 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
- Has 38 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























