Car comparison

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPvsRenault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna III

2.0 dCi FAP

178 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2008-2009
VS

Renault Megane III (PHASE II)

GT 2.0 TCe

180 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2012-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,015 km
    631 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Power
178hp133kW
180hp134kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,539kg3,393lb
1,326kg2,923lb
Gross weight
2,089kg4,605lb
1,854kg4,087lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
93.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
87.1s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
45.0s
Calculated
46.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,015km631mi
Calculated
779km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,695mm185in
4,295mm169in
Width
1,811mm71in
1,808mm71in
Height
1,445mm57in
1,471mm58in
Wheelbase
2,756mm109in
2,641mm104in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,546mm61in
Rear track
1,512mm60in
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance
120mm5in
120mm5in
Trunk volume
450L
405L
Max trunk volume
1,377L
1,162L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
60L
CO2 emissions-
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPRenault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCePowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
  • Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP3,750 rpm2,000 rpm4,000 rpm
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe5,500 rpm2,250 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
45.0 s
46.0 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
142 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
180 hp
134 kW

Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe has 2 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
1,326 kg
2,923 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
218 km/h
135 mph
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP8.5 s
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe8.5 s

Although Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe has more power, Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,015 km
631 mi
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
779 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW
8.5 s
218 km/h
135 mph
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,295 mm
169.1 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.5 s
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Power
178 hp
133 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
1,326 kg
2,923 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,295 mm
169.1 in
Height
1,471 mm
57.9 in
Range score
1,015 km
631 mi
779 km
484 mi
CO2 score
-
178 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPRenault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 236 km (147 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 213 kg lighter
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 1.6 Energy dCi
VS
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane IVGT 1.6 Energy dCi
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane III CCGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo
GT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
GT 2.0 TCe
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane III GrandtourGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
GT 2.0 TCe
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCevsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP vs Renault Megane III (PHASE II) GT 2.0 TCe - car comparison - FastVsFaster