Renault Laguna II Grandtour
Car comparison
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24VvsVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
2.5T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score80/100
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 207hp154kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,666kg3,673lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 680km422mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,946cc180cu in | 2,521cc154cu in |
| Length | 4,695mm185in | 4,710mm185in |
| Width | 1,772mm70in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,443mm57in | 1,490mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,755mm108in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,480mm58in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 475L | 485L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | 1,641L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T has 3 hp more than Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,666 kg 3,673 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 680 km 422 mi |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 207 hp 154 kW | 8.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLaguna II Grandtour3.0 V6 24V | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 207 hp 154 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,666 kg 3,673 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 680 km 422 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 17.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,599 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Laguna II Grandtour 3.0 V6 24V
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























