Renault Megane II
Car comparison
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16VvsRenault Laguna 2.9 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Laguna
2.9 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score83/100
Renault Laguna 2.9 24V
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultLaguna2.9 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 267Nm197lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.7s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 88.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.1s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 194Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 2,946cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,228mm166in | 4,510mm178in |
| Width | 2,026mm80in | 1,750mm69in |
| Height | 1,436mm57in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,517mm60in | 1,480mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,521mm60in | 1,460mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,190L | 1,335L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
- Renault Laguna 2.9 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultLaguna2.9 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.1 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 190 hp 142 kW |
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V has 34 hp more than Renault Laguna 2.9 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna 2.9 24V and Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 267 Nm 197 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Renault Laguna 2.9 24V: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultLaguna2.9 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | RenaultLaguna2.9 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 267 Nm 197 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 33 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Renault Laguna 2.9 24V
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























