Renault Vel Satis
Car comparison
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6vsRenault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Clio III (PHASE II)
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Lightest1,204 kg2,654 lb
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful241 hp180 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 241hp180kW | 201hp150kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 215Nm159lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,204kg2,654lb |
| Gross weight | 2,270kg5,004lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 104.6s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.4s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 179Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 671km417mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,860mm191in | 4,017mm158in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,769mm70in |
| Height | 1,575mm62in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,585mm102in |
| Front track | 1,575mm62in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,550mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 288L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,038L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 7,100 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.4 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW |
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 has 40 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 40 hp (30 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 8.3 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
Although Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 has more power, Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 696 km 432 mi |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 671 km 417 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 241 hp 180 kW | 8.3 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultVel Satis3.5 V6 | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 241 hp 180 kW | 201 hp 150 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 671 km 417 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6 | Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Vel Satis 3.5 V6
- Has 40 hp more
- Has 115 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 172 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Is 516 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























