Car comparison

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GTvsRenault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Laguna II

2.0 i 16V GT

204 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2005-2007
VS

Renault Clio III (PHASE II)

RS 2.0 16V

201 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2010-2012

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    430 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Lightest
    1,204 kg
    2,654 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    167 hp/t
    124 kW/t
    6.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
204hp152kW
201hp150kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
215Nm159lb-ft
Curb weight
1,320kg2,910lb
1,204kg2,654lb
Gross weight
1,950kg4,299lb
1,690kg3,726lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
73.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.2s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
29.3s
Calculated
31.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.8s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
179Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
671km417mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,576mm180in
4,017mm158in
Width
1,772mm70in
1,769mm70in
Height
1,429mm56in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,740mm108in
2,585mm102in
Front track
1,525mm60in
1,520mm60in
Rear track
1,480mm58in
1,520mm60in
Ground clearance-
120mm5in
Trunk volume
430L
288L
Max trunk volume
1,330L
1,038L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
70L
55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GTRenault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VPowerTorque
  • Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: Power / Torque
  • Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT5,000 rpm3,000 rpm5,250 rpm
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V7,100 rpm5,400 rpm7,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.8 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.2 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.3 s
31.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
204 hp
152 kW
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
201 hp
150 kW

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT has 3 hp more than Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
215 Nm
159 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
1,204 kg
2,654 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT7.2 s
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V6.9 s

Although Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT has more power, Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
204 hp
152 kW
7.2 s
235 km/h
146 mph
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
201 hp
150 kW
6.9 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
201 hp
150 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,017 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
Power
204 hp
152 kW
201 hp
150 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
215 Nm
159 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.2 s
6.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,320 kg
2,910 lb
1,204 kg
2,654 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
430 L
15.2 cu ft
Length
4,576 mm
180.2 in
Height
1,429 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,017 mm
158.1 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
-
671 km
417 mi
Trunk score
430 L
15.2 cu ft
288 L
10.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
167 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 85 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 142 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest

Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V

  • Is 116 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
2.0 16V Sport
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V GT
RS 2.0 16V
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
RS 2.0 16V
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane IIIGT 2.0 TCe
2.0 i 16V GT
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GTvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
RS 2.0 16V
GT 2.0 TCe
VS
RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16VvsRenaultMegane III (PHASE II)GT 2.0 TCe
Renault Laguna II 2.0 i 16V GT vs Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V - car comparison - FastVsFaster