Car comparison

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V SportvsRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Clio II (PHASE III)

2.0 16V Sport

179 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualNaturally aspiratedHatchback2003-2006
VS

Renault Laguna III

2.0 dCi FAP

178 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2008-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,015 km
    631 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    179 hp
    133 kW
  • Lightest
    1,110 kg
    2,447 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    161 hp/t
    120 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
179hp133kW
178hp133kW
Torque
200Nm148lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,110kg2,447lb
1,539kg3,393lb
Gross weight-
2,089kg4,605lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
70.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
93.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
32.5s
Calculated
45.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
161hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
180Nm/t121lb-ft/ton
Calculated
260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
617km384mi
Calculated
1,015km631mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
3,811mm150in
4,695mm185in
Width
1,639mm65in
1,811mm71in
Height
1,409mm55in
1,445mm57in
Wheelbase
2,471mm97in
2,756mm109in
Front track
1,418mm56in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,392mm55in
1,512mm60in
Ground clearance-
120mm5in
Trunk volume
255L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,037L
1,377L
Doors
3
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
66L
CO2 emissions
194g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V SportRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAPPowerTorque
  • Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: Power / Torque
  • Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport6,500 rpm5,250 rpm6,750 rpm
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP3,750 rpm2,000 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.5 s
45.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
179 hp
133 kW
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport has 1 hp more than Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP.

The biggest power difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
200 Nm
148 lb-ft
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
1,110 kg
2,447 lb
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,539 kg
3,393 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
222 km/h
138 mph
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport7.1 s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport and Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP: 1.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP and Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
617 km
384 mi
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
1,015 km
631 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
179 hp
133 kW
7.1 s
222 km/h
138 mph
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
178 hp
133 kW
8.5 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
179 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Length
3,811 mm
150.0 in
Height
1,409 mm
55.5 in
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
Power
179 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
178 hp
133 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
7.1 s
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V Sport
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Power
179 hp
133 kW
178 hp
133 kW
Torque
200 Nm
148 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
8.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,110 kg
2,447 lb
1,539 kg
3,393 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
255 L
9.0 cu ft
Length
3,811 mm
150.0 in
Height
1,409 mm
55.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,695 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,445 mm
56.9 in
Range score
617 km
384 mi
1,015 km
631 mi
CO2 score
194 g/km
-
Trunk score
255 L
9.0 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
161 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
116 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V SportRenault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 429 kg lighter
  • Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP

  • Has 200 Nm more
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 398 km (247 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 195 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport
Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio III (PHASE I)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V GT
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II2.0 i 16V GT
2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna III Grandtour2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Sport
3.0 V6
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE I)3.0 V6
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna2.9 24V
2.0 16V Sport
3.0i V6 24V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultClio Sport (PHASE II)3.0i V6 24V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 i 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna II Grandtour2.0 i 16V Turbo
2.0 dCi FAP
2.0 16V Turbo
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Coupe2.0 16V Turbo
2.0 16V Sport
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V
2.0 dCi FAP
2.9 24V
VS
RenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAPvsRenaultLaguna Grandtour2.9 24V
2.0 16V Sport
2.0 dCi FAP
VS
RenaultClio II (PHASE III)2.0 16V SportvsRenaultLaguna III2.0 dCi FAP
Renault Clio II (PHASE III) 2.0 16V Sport vs Renault Laguna III 2.0 dCi FAP - car comparison - FastVsFaster