Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country · Facelift 2016 2.0 D3vsRenault Captur II 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Captur II
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,632 km1,014 mi
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score97/100
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe
- Lightest1,368 kg3,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight102 hp/t76 kW/t9.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk536 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 140hp104kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,500kg3,307lb | 1,368kg3,016lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 1,811kg3,993lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 196 km/h 122 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 100.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 88.3s99% target: 194 km/h / 121 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 45.4s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.5L/100 km67.2mpg US80.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 100hp/t75kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 102hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,632km1,014mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,227mm166in |
| Width | 1,783mm70in | 1,797mm71in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,576mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,639mm104in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 142mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 324L | 536L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 99g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 45.4 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 196 km/h 122 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 140 hp 104 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 has 10 hp more than Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe and Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 196 km/h 122 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 8.5 s |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 9.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 and Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 1,632 km 1,014 mi |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 140 hp 104 kW | 9.2 s | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
| RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D3 | RenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 140 hp 104 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,500 kg 3,307 lb | 1,368 kg 3,016 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,632 km 1,014 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 99 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 324 L 11.4 cu ft | 536 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 100 hp/t 75 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 102 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3 | Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 6.65 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 997.50 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country Facelift 2016 2.0 D3
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 818 km (508 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Renault Captur II 1.3 TCe
- Is 132 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 212 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























