Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsPorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight140 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range938 km583 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 237hp177kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,445kg5,390lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.9s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.9s Calculated | 35.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 938km583mi Calculated | 867km539mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,681mm184in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,624mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 167g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.9 s | 35.9 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 237 hp 177 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI has 3 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 938 km 583 mi |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 867 km 539 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 237 hp 177 kW | 6.9 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 237 hp 177 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 2,025 kg 4,464 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 938 km 583 mi | 867 km 539 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 167 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI | Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























