Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8vsPorsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Macan I (95B)
Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed275 km/h171 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Largest trunk656 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
- Lightest1,925 kg4,244 lb
- Best power-to-weight229 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 440hp328kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Gross weight | 2,890kg6,371lb | 2,550kg5,622lb |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.6s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 58.4s99% target: 269 km/h / 167 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.7s | 14.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 228hp/t170kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 229hp/t170kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 773km480mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,604cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 4,699mm185in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,609mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 2,807mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,651mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 234mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 656L | 500L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,708L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | - | 75L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 224g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.7 s | 14.5 s |
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 272 km/h 169 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 440 hp 328 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8 has 60 hp more than Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 272 km/h 169 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 4.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 229 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 4.4 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 440 hp 328 kW | 4.4 s | 272 km/h 169 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 |
| 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 229 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8 | PorscheMacan I (95B)Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 440 hp 328 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 275 km/h 171 mph | 272 km/h 169 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,190 kg 4,828 lb | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.3 L/100 km 17.7 mpg US 21.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 773 km 480 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 224 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 656 L 23.2 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 229 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8 | Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.28 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 37.46 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,491 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 GTS 4.0 V8
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 156 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Porsche Macan I (95B) Turbo 3.6 V6 performance
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























