Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4vsPorsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Boxster (986)
S 3.2
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed279 km/h173 mph
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight240 hp/t179 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Lightest1,360 kg2,998 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330hp246kW | 260hp194kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 310Nm229lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Gross weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,670kg3,682lb |
| Top speed | 279 km/h 173 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 276 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 79.6s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 22.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 240hp/t179kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | 577km358mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 3,179cc194cu in |
| Length | 4,404mm173in | 4,320mm170in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,273mm50in | 1,290mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,415mm95in |
| Front track | - | 1,455mm57in |
| Rear track | - | 1,514mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 121mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 260L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 190g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4: Power / Torque
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 22.4 s |
| Top speed | 279 km/h 173 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 330 hp 246 kW |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW |
Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4 has 70 hp more than Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 and Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4: 70 hp (52 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 279 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 258 km/h 160 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 4.9 s |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4 and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4 and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 780 km 485 mi |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 577 km 358 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 330 hp 246 kW | 4.9 s | 279 km/h 173 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW | 6.4 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)GTS 3.4 | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp 246 kW | 260 hp 194 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 279 km/h 173 mph | 258 km/h 160 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,360 kg 2,998 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | 577 km 358 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 190 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 240 hp/t 179 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4 | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 19.43 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,914 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) GTS 3.4
- Has 70 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 204 km (127 mi) more estimated range
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Is 15 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























