Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4vsPorsche 928 5.0 GT V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 928
5.0 GT V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score82/100
Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,375kg3,031lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 1,675kg3,693lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 113.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 85.0s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.1s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.7s | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 272Nm/t182lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 691km430mi Calculated | 393km244mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 4,957cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,347mm171in | 4,520mm178in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,836mm72in |
| Height | 1,306mm51in | 1,282mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,500mm98in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,551mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | - |
| Ground clearance | 126mm5in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 86L |
| CO2 emissions | 221g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: Power / Torque
- Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 7,200 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 6,200 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.1 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.7 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8 has 10 hp more than Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 and Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 5.1 s |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 5.8 s |
Although Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8 has more power, Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 and Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 and Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8: 12.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 691 km 430 mi |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 393 km 244 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.8 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 |
| 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | Porsche9285.0 GT V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.1 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 21.9 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 691 km 430 mi | 393 km 244 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 221 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 | Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 21.9 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 38.32 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 61.68 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 3,285 L868 US gal723 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 5,749 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 12.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 299 km (186 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Porsche 928 5.0 GT V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























