Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) · Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8vsPorsche 911 Targa (992) · Facelift 2024 4S 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Targa (992) · Facelift 2024
4S 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8
- Fastest top speed312 km/h194 mph
- Most powerful500 hp373 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,670 kg3,682 lb
- Best power-to-weight299 hp/t223 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk163 L
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 480hp358kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 2,085kg4,597lb |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated | 85.2s99% target: 305 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 12.5s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.7L/100 km14.1mpg US16.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 283hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 389Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,542mm179in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,302mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,350mm93in | 2,450mm96in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 163L |
| Max trunk volume | 105L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 12.5 s |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 129 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW |
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 has 20 hp more than Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 308 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 3.5 s |
Although Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 has more power, Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.7 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 480 hp 358 kW | 3.5 s | 308 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Cabriolet (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 Targa (992)Facelift 20244S 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 480 hp 358 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 308 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | 163 L 5.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 283 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 | Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.13 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,019 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 911 Targa (992) Facelift 2024 4S 3.0
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 58 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























