Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) · Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) · Facelift 2024
Carrera GTS 3.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful650 hp485 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight380 hp/t283 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score94/100
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6
- Lightest1,675 kg3,693 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk135 L
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 650hp485kW | 485hp362kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,675kg3,693lb |
| Gross weight | 2,080kg4,586lb | 2,095kg4,619lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 3.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.3s | 10.9s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 380hp/t283kW/t172hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton Calculated | 340Nm/t228lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 593km368mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,745cc229cu in | 3,591cc219cu in |
| Length | 4,535mm179in | 4,553mm179in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,583mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 128L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 135L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 3.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.3 s | 10.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 53.4 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.6 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 212 km/h 132 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 485 hp 362 kW |
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 has 165 hp more than Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8: 165 hp (123 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 2.8 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 3.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 380 hp/t 283 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 2.8 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 485 hp 362 kW | 3.1 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 |
| 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | 380 hp/t 283 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 650 hp 485 kW | 485 hp 362 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 3.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,675 kg 3,693 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km 22.0 mpg US 26.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 593 km 368 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 128 L 4.5 cu ft | 135 L 4.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 380 hp/t 283 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 18.72 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 30.13 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,809 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Turbo S 3.8
- Has 165 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 91 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera GTS 3.6
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























