Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8vsPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) · Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 Cabriolet (992) · Facelift 2024
Carrera T 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed294 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,555 kg3,428 lb
- Best power-to-weight257 hp/t192 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Largest trunk285 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 394hp294kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 1,955kg4,310lb | 1,985kg4,376lb |
| Top speed | 294 km/h 183 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 291 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 83.6s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.1s Calculated | 15.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 739km459mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,491mm177in | 4,542mm179in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,293mm51in | 1,292mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 285L | 163L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.1 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | 294 km/h 183 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 394 hp 294 kW |
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 has 6 hp more than Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 294 km/h 183 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 4.3 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.3 s | 294 km/h 183 mph |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 394 hp 294 kW | 4.7 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Cabriolet (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Facelift 2024Carrera T 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 394 hp 294 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 294 km/h 183 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 739 km 459 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 285 L 10.1 cu ft | 163 L 5.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 257 hp/t 192 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (991) Carrera 4S 3.8
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 122 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Facelift 2024 Carrera T 3.0
- Has 10 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























