Porsche 911 (997) · Facelift 2008
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (997) · Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8vsPorsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (992)
GT3 RS 4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8
- Fastest top speed312 km/h194 mph
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.5 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range578 km359 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.2 s
- Most powerful525 hp391 kW
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight362 hp/t270 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 500hp373kW | 525hp391kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 465Nm343lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,935kg4,266lb | 1,795kg3,957lb |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 53.6s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated | 56.8s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s Calculated | 10.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.5L/100 km14.3mpg US17.1mpg UK | 17.6L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 11.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 318hp/t237kW/t144hp/1000 lb Calculated | 362hp/t270kW/t164hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 414Nm/t277lb-ft/ton Calculated | 321Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 578km359mi Calculated | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,450mm175in | 4,572mm180in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,350mm93in | 2,457mm97in |
| Ground clearance | - | 100mm4in |
| Max trunk volume | 105L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 272g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 8,500 rpm | 6,300 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 11.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 500 hp 373 kW |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 525 hp 391 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0 has 25 hp more than Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 and Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 3.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0 and Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 and Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 362 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 578 km 359 mi |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 504 km 313 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 500 hp 373 kW | 3.7 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.2 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | 362 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)GT3 RS 4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 500 hp 373 kW | 525 hp 391 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 312 km/h 194 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 578 km 359 mi | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 272 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 318 hp/t 237 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 362 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8 | Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 22.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,334 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (997) Facelift 2008 Turbo 3.8
- Has 185 Nm more
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 (992) GT3 RS 4.0
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























