Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8vsPorsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (997)
GT2 3.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful580 hp433 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions212 g/km
- Best estimated range747 km464 mi
- Largest trunk115 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score40/100
Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
- Lightest1,440 kg3,175 lb
- Best power-to-weight368 hp/t274 kW/t2.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 580hp433kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,440kg3,175lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 42.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 53.4s99% target: 326 km/h / 202 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.9s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 18.8L/100 km12.5mpg US15.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.3s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 363hp/t270kW/t164hp/1000 lb Calculated | 368hp/t274kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 469Nm/t314lb-ft/ton Calculated | 472Nm/t316lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 747km464mi Calculated | 720km447mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,600cc220cu in |
| Length | 4,507mm177in | 4,469mm176in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,297mm51in | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,350mm93in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 115L | 105L |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 90L |
| CO2 emissions | 212g/km | 298g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 6,750 rpm | 2,250-4,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,200-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.9 s | 10.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 34.0 s | 44.0 s |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.7 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.3 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 230 km/h 143 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 580 hp 433 kW |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 530 hp 395 kW |
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8 has 50 hp more than Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 329 km/h 204 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 2.9 s |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 363 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 747 km 464 mi |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 720 km 447 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 580 hp 433 kW | 2.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 530 hp 395 kW | 3.7 s | 329 km/h 204 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | 363 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche911 (997)GT2 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 580 hp 433 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 329 km/h 204 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,440 kg 3,175 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 747 km 464 mi | 720 km 447 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 212 g/km | 298 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | 105 L 3.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 363 hp/t 270 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 368 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8 | Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo S 3.8
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
- Emits 86 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Porsche 911 (997) GT2 3.6
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























