Porsche 911 (991)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8vsPorsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (992)
Carrera 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed297 km/h185 mph
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,485 kg3,274 lb
- Best power-to-weight269 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range747 km464 mi
- Largest trunk385 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score79/100
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions206 g/km
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 385hp287kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,485kg3,274lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 1,895kg4,178lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 297 km/h 185 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.2s99% target: 294 km/h / 183 mph Calculated | 59.1s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.3s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 269hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 296Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 747km464mi Calculated | 711km442mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,491mm177in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,298mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,552mm61in | 1,557mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 385L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 132L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 212g/km | 206g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 7,400 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
| Top speed | 297 km/h 185 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 has 15 hp more than Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 297 km/h 185 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 4.1 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 4.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 747 km 464 mi |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 711 km 442 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.1 s | 297 km/h 185 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.2 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 385 hp 287 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 297 km/h 185 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,485 kg 3,274 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 747 km 464 mi | 711 km 442 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 212 g/km | 206 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8 | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4S 3.8
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
- Has 253 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























