Porsche 911 (996) · Facelift 2001
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (996) · Facelift 2001 Turbo 3.6vsPorsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (991)
Carrera 4 GTS 3.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful430 hp321 kW
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight289 hp/t215 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk385 L
- Best economy score82/100
Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 Turbo 3.6
- Fastest top speed303 km/h188 mph
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 430hp321kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,885kg4,156lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Top speed | 303 km/h 188 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.3s99% target: 300 km/h / 186 mph Calculated | 56.6s99% target: 299 km/h / 186 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.7s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.8L/100 km12.5mpg US15.0mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 273hp/t203kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 289hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 364Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 295Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 747km464mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,600cc220cu in | 3,800cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,465mm176in | 4,509mm178in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,350mm93in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,465mm58in | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,522mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 385L |
| Max trunk volume | 100L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 212g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 Turbo 3.6: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.7 s | 11.8 s |
| Top speed | 303 km/h 188 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 200 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 430 hp 321 kW |
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 has 10 hp more than Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 Turbo 3.6.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 Turbo 3.6 and Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 302 km/h 188 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 4.2 s |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 and Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 Turbo 3.6: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 273 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 289 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.2 s | 303 km/h 188 mph |
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | 430 hp 321 kW | 4.0 s | 302 km/h 188 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (996)Facelift 2001Turbo 3.6 | Porsche911 (991)Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 430 hp 321 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 303 km/h 188 mph | 302 km/h 188 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 747 km 464 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 212 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 273 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 289 hp/t 215 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (996) Facelift 2001 Turbo 3.6
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 911 (991) Carrera 4 GTS 3.8
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 285 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























