Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5vsPorsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Cayman (981C)
GTS 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions190 g/km
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Largest trunk425 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 65.0s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.2s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated | 247hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 310Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 780km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,497cc152cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,404mm173in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,295mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,515mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,539mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 425L |
| Max trunk volume | 150L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | 190g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
- Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,750-5,800 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.2 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 has 10 hp more than Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 4.9 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 4.8 s |
Although Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 has more power, Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 696 km 432 mi |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 780 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.9 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.8 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 780 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | 190 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 150 L 5.3 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 | Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 14.35 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,153 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 85 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Has 275 L more trunk volume
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























