Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0vsPorsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Cayman (982)
S 2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful370 hp276 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions193 g/km
- Best estimated range753 km468 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Largest trunk275 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,445kg3,186lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.9s Calculated | 15.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 753km468mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,497cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | - | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 275L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 193g/km | 200g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.9 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 has 20 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 753 km 468 mi |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.2 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.4 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,445 kg 3,186 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 753 km 468 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 193 g/km | 200 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 7 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) S 2.5
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 130 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























