Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0vsPorsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Spyder (982)
4.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Most powerful493 hp368 kW
- Highest torque449 Nm331 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight337 hp/t251 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk136 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score87/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Best economy score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 493hp368kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 449Nm331lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,464kg3,228lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,771kg3,904lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 48.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 87.9s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.6s Calculated | 13.4s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.0s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 337hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated | 290hp/t216kW/t131hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 297Nm/t198lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 520km323mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 3,995cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,455mm175in | 4,430mm174in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,267mm50in | 1,258mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,484mm98in | 2,484mm98in |
| Front track | - | 1,538mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,534mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 102mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 120L |
| Max trunk volume | 136L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 8,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 7,600 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.6 s | 13.4 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.0 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 493 hp 368 kW |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW |
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0 has 73 hp more than Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0: 73 hp (54 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 1,464 kg 3,228 lb |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 3.4 s |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0 and Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 520 km 323 mi |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 493 hp 368 kW | 3.4 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 420 hp 313 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | Porsche718 Spyder (982)4.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 493 hp 368 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,464 kg 3,228 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 520 km 323 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 136 L 4.8 cu ft | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 290 hp/t 216 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0 | Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0
- Has 73 hp more
- Has 19 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 47 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Porsche 718 Spyder (982) 4.0
- Is 14 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 107 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























