Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0vsPorsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 718 Boxster (982)
S 2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk132 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score47/100
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
- Lightest1,385 kg3,053 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions200 g/km
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 350hp261kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,385kg3,053lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.6s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 73.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.5s Calculated | 15.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 244hp/t182kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 696km432mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,497cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,379mm172in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,297mm51in | 1,280mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 125L |
| Max trunk volume | 132L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 210g/km | 200g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 6,500 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.5 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 119 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW |
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0 has 35 hp more than Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 and Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 4.4 s |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 4.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 696 km 432 mi |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.4 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.4 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 |
| 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 Cabriolet (992)Carrera 3.0 | Porsche718 Boxster (982)S 2.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 350 hp 261 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,385 kg 3,053 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 696 km 432 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 210 g/km | 200 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 125 L 4.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 244 hp/t 182 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0 | Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 Cabriolet (992) Carrera 3.0
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Porsche 718 Boxster (982) S 2.5
- Is 190 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 32 km (20 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























