Car comparison

Yangwang U7 150.01 kWhvsPolestar 5 112 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Yangwang U7

150.01 kWh

1306 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2026-present
VS

Polestar 5

112 kWh

884 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSedan2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Yangwang U7 150.01 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    300 km/h
    186 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    1,306 hp
    974 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,680 Nm
    1,239 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    409 hp/t
    305 kW/t
    2.4 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    86/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    73/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelYangwangU7150.01 kWhPolestar5112 kWh
Power
1,306hp974kW
884hp659kW
Torque
1,680Nm1,239lb-ft
1,015Nm749lb-ft
Curb weight
3,195kg7,044lb
2,503kg5,518lb
Gross weight
3,495kg7,705lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
29.5s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
26.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.9s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
7.2s
Calculated
8.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.8s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Quarter mile
10.0s
Calculated
10.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
409hp/t305kW/t185hp/1000 lb
Calculated
353hp/t263kW/t160hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
526Nm/t352lb-ft/ton
Calculated
406Nm/t271lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
5,265mm207in
5,087mm200in
Width
1,998mm79in
2,015mm79in
Height
1,517mm60in
1,419mm56in
Wheelbase
3,160mm124in
3,054mm120in
Front track
1,710mm67in
1,716mm68in
Rear track
1,717mm68in
1,684mm66in
Ground clearance-
153mm6in
Trunk volume-
365L
Max trunk volume-
1,128L
Doors
4
4
Seats
4
4

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricYangwangU7150.01 kWhPolestar5112 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.8 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.9 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.2 s
8.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.6 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
7.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.5 s
9.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.0 s
10.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
241 km/h
150 mph
218 km/h
135 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
YangwangU7150.01 kWh
1,306 hp
974 kW
Polestar5112 kWh
884 hp
659 kW

Yangwang U7 150.01 kWh has 422 hp more than Polestar 5 112 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Polestar 5 112 kWh and Yangwang U7 150.01 kWh: 422 hp (315 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
YangwangU7150.01 kWh
1,680 Nm
1,239 lb-ft
Polestar5112 kWh
1,015 Nm
749 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
YangwangU7150.01 kWh
3,195 kg
7,044 lb
Polestar5112 kWh
2,503 kg
5,518 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
YangwangU7150.01 kWh
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Polestar5112 kWh
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
YangwangU7150.01 kWh2.9 s
Polestar5112 kWh3.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Yangwang U7 150.01 kWh and Polestar 5 112 kWh: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
YangwangU7150.01 kWh
409 hp/t
305 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
Polestar5112 kWh
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
YangwangU7150.01 kWh
1,306 hp
974 kW
2.9 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Polestar5112 kWh
884 hp
659 kW
3.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
YangwangU7150.01 kWh
Power
1,306 hp
974 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,265 mm
207.3 in
Height
1,517 mm
59.7 in
Polestar5112 kWh
Power
884 hp
659 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
5,087 mm
200.3 in
Height
1,419 mm
55.9 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleYangwangU7150.01 kWhPolestar5112 kWh
Power
1,306 hp
974 kW
884 hp
659 kW
Torque
1,680 Nm
1,239 lb-ft
1,015 Nm
749 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.9 s
3.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
3,195 kg
7,044 lb
2,503 kg
5,518 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,265 mm
207.3 in
Height
1,517 mm
59.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
5,087 mm
200.3 in
Height
1,419 mm
55.9 in
Trunk score
-
365 L
12.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
409 hp/t
305 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
353 hp/t
263 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Yangwang U7 150.01 kWh

  • Has 422 hp more
  • Has 665 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 56 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest

Polestar 5 112 kWh

  • Is 692 kg lighter

Pros

  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Yangwang U7 150.01 kWh
Polestar 5 112 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

150.01 kWh
CS 3.0
VS
YangwangU7150.01 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80)CS 3.0
112 kWh
M70 105.7 kWh
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWi7 (G70)M70 105.7 kWh
150.01 kWh
CS 4.4 V8
VS
YangwangU7150.01 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90 LCI)Facelift 2020CS 4.4 V8
112 kWh
AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE (V295)AMG EQE 53 100 kWh
150.01 kWh
Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
VS
YangwangU7150.01 kWhvsAlfa RomeoGiulia (952)Facelift 2022Quadrifoglio 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo
150.01 kWh
112 kWh
VS
YangwangU7150.01 kWhvsPolestar5112 kWh
112 kWh
S 680 V8
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)Facelift 2026S 680 V8
112 kWh
Competition 3.0
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM3 (G80 LCI)Facelift 2024Competition 3.0
150.01 kWh
S 580 V8
VS
YangwangU7150.01 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class (W223)Facelift 2026S 580 V8
112 kWh
S 680 V12
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach S-class (Z223)S 680 V12
150.01 kWh
AMG E 63 S
VS
YangwangU7150.01 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
112 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
Polestar5112 kWhvsBMWM5 (F90)Competition 4.4 V8
Yangwang U7 150.01 kWh vs Polestar 5 112 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster