Car comparison

Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWhvsPolestar 3 111 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Xiaomi YU7

Pro 96.3 kWh

496 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2025-present
VS

Polestar 3

111 kWh

490 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    496 hp
    370 kW
  • Lightest
    2,425 kg
    5,346 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    205 hp/t
    153 kW/t
    4.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    678 L
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    81/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelXiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhPolestar3111 kWh
Power
496hp370kW
490hp365kW
Torque
690Nm509lb-ft
840Nm620lb-ft
Curb weight
2,425kg5,346lb
2,670kg5,886lb
Gross weight
2,875kg6,338lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
45.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
51.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.3s
5.0s
0-200 km/h
14.7s
Calculated
24.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.1s
Calculated
4.7s
Calculated
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
285Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Length
4,999mm197in
4,900mm193in
Width
1,996mm79in
2,120mm83in
Height
1,600mm63in
1,627mm64in
Wheelbase
3,000mm118in
2,985mm118in
Front track
1,694mm67in
-
Rear track
1,700mm67in
-
Ground clearance
222mm9in
211mm8in
Trunk volume
678L
484L
Max trunk volume
1,758L
1,411L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricXiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhPolestar3111 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.1 s
4.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.3 s
5.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.7 s
24.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.1 s
8.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
186 km/h
116 mph
167 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh
496 hp
370 kW
Polestar3111 kWh
490 hp
365 kW

Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWh has 6 hp more than Polestar 3 111 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Polestar 3 111 kWh and Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWh: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh
690 Nm
509 lb-ft
Polestar3111 kWh
840 Nm
620 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
Polestar3111 kWh
2,670 kg
5,886 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Polestar3111 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh4.3 s
Polestar3111 kWh5.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWh and Polestar 3 111 kWh: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Polestar3111 kWh
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh
496 hp
370 kW
4.3 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Polestar3111 kWh
490 hp
365 kW
5.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWh
Power
496 hp
370 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
678 L
23.9 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Polestar3111 kWh
Power
490 hp
365 kW
0-100 km/h5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
484 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,900 mm
192.9 in
Height
1,627 mm
64.1 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleXiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhPolestar3111 kWh
Power
496 hp
370 kW
490 hp
365 kW
Torque
690 Nm
509 lb-ft
840 Nm
620 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.3 s
5.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,425 kg
5,346 lb
2,670 kg
5,886 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
678 L
23.9 cu ft
Length
4,999 mm
196.8 in
Height
1,600 mm
63.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
484 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,900 mm
192.9 in
Height
1,627 mm
64.1 in
Trunk score
678 L
23.9 cu ft
484 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
184 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWh

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 245 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 194 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Polestar 3 111 kWh

  • Has 150 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWh
Polestar 3 111 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Pro 96.3 kWh
GLS 580 V8
VS
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 580 V8
111 kWh
AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
VS
Polestar3111 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
Pro 96.3 kWh
100 kWh
VS
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhvsAUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh
111 kWh
114 kWh
VS
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh
Pro 96.3 kWh
GTS 4.0 V8
VS
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhvsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 2023GTS 4.0 V8
111 kWh
114 kWh
VS
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron Sportback114 kWh
Pro 96.3 kWh
Performance 84.7 kWh
VS
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhvsTeslaModel Y JuniperFacelift 2025Performance 84.7 kWh
111 kWh
EQS 500 125 kWh
VS
Polestar3111 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh
Pro 96.3 kWh
GLS 600 V8
VS
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhvsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 600 V8
111 kWh
S 95 kWh
VS
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDIe-tronS 95 kWh
Pro 96.3 kWh
111 kWh
VS
XiaomiYU7Pro 96.3 kWhvsPolestar3111 kWh
111 kWh
Long Range 80.5 kWh
VS
Polestar3111 kWhvsTeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh
Xiaomi YU7 Pro 96.3 kWh vs Polestar 3 111 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster