XPENG P7+ · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
XPENG P7+ · Facelift 2026 74.9 kWhvsPolestar 2 78 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPolestar 2
78 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 74.9 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful503 hp375 kW
- Highest torque670 Nm494 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk573 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Polestar 2 78 kWh
- Lightest2,113 kg4,658 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | Polestar278 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 503hp375kW | 408hp304kW |
| Torque | 670Nm494lb-ft | 660Nm487lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,113kg4,658lb |
| Gross weight | 2,685kg5,919lb | 2,600kg5,732lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 45.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 52.4s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.6s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,071mm200in | 4,606mm181in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,512mm60in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 2,735mm108in |
| Front track | 1,632mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,662mm65in | 1,601mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 151mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 573L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,931L | 440L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | Polestar278 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.6 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW |
| Polestar278 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW |
XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 74.9 kWh has 95 hp more than Polestar 2 78 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Polestar 2 78 kWh and XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 74.9 kWh: 95 hp (71 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft |
| Polestar278 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
| Polestar278 kWh | 2,113 kg 4,658 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Polestar278 kWh | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | 4.3 s |
| Polestar278 kWh | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 74.9 kWh and Polestar 2 78 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Polestar278 kWh | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| Polestar278 kWh | 408 hp 304 kW | 4.7 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Polestar278 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | XPENGP7+Facelift 202674.9 kWh | Polestar278 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 503 hp 375 kW | 408 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 670 Nm 494 lb-ft | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | 2,113 kg 4,658 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 573 L 20.2 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
XPENG P7+ Facelift 2026 74.9 kWh
- Has 95 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Polestar 2 78 kWh
- Is 112 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























