Opel Signum · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Opel Signum · Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V TurbovsRenault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II
RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score83/100
Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.2s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 682km424mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,651mm183in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | - |
| Height | 1,466mm58in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,410L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 5,500 rpm | - | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.2 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has 6 hp more than Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 7.6 s |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 6.5 s |
Although Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has more power, Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V and Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | RenaultMegane IIRS 2.0 Turbo 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 682 km 424 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Renault Megane II RS 2.0 Turbo 16V
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























