Opel Signum · Facelift 2005
Car comparison
Opel Signum · Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V TurbovsRenault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Megane II (PHASE II)
RS 2.0 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Lightest1,375 kg3,031 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score84/100
Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful230 hp172 kW
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Largest trunk365 L
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 230hp172kW | 224hp167kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.6s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.2s Calculated | 26.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,792cc170cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,651mm183in | 4,228mm166in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,777mm70in |
| Height | 1,466mm58in | 1,436mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,830mm111in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,536mm60in | 1,517mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,525mm60in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,410L | 1,190L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: Power / Torque
- Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 5,500 rpm | - | 5,750 rpm |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.2 s | 26.2 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 224 hp 167 kW |
Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has 6 hp more than Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 7.6 s |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 6.5 s |
Although Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo has more power, Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | 230 hp 172 kW | 7.6 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.5 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelSignumFacelift 20052.8i V6 24V Turbo | RenaultMegane II (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 230 hp 172 kW | 224 hp 167 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Signum Facelift 2005 2.8i V6 24V Turbo
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Renault Megane II (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























