Opel Astra K
Car comparison
Opel Astra K 1.6 TurbovsVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 · Facelift 2016
2.0 D4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions99 g/km
- Best estimated range1,632 km1,014 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score97/100
Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,303 kg2,873 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk370 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,303kg2,873lb | 1,503kg3,314lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,005kg4,420lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 85.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.1s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 727km452mi Calculated | 1,632km1,014mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,369mm172in |
| Width | 1,809mm71in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,485mm58in | 1,439mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,662mm105in | 2,647mm104in |
| Front track | 1,544mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 370L | 335L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,210L | 1,500L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 151g/km | 99g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 1,650-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.1 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo has 10 hp more than Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 1,303 kg 2,873 lb |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 7.8 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 7.4 s |
Although Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo has more power, Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 and Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 727 km 452 mi |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 1,632 km 1,014 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 |
| 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelAstra K1.6 Turbo | VolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,303 kg 2,873 lb | 1,503 kg 3,314 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 3.8 L/100 km 61.9 mpg US 74.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 727 km 452 mi | 1,632 km 1,014 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 151 g/km | 99 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 370 L 13.1 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo | Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 6.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 10.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 570 L151 US gal125 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 997.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Astra K 1.6 Turbo
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo V40 Facelift 2016 2.0 D4
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 904 km (562 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 52 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























