Polestar 3
111 kWh
490 hpElectricAWDAutomaticSUV2022-2025
Car comparison
Polestar 3 111 kWhvsOnvo L90 85 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Onvo L90
85 kWh
462 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2025-present
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 3 111 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful490 hp365 kW
- Highest torque840 Nm620 lb-ft
- Largest trunk484 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Onvo L90 85 kWh
- Lightest2,320 kg5,115 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar3111 kWh | OnvoL9085 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 490hp365kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 840Nm620lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,320kg5,115lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,920kg6,437lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 51.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 32.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated | 172Nm/t115lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,900mm193in | 5,145mm203in |
| Width | 2,120mm83in | 1,998mm79in |
| Height | 1,627mm64in | 1,786mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,985mm118in | 3,110mm122in |
| Front track | - | 1,720mm68in |
| Rear track | - | 1,717mm68in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 430L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,411L | 2,276L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar3111 kWh | OnvoL9085 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 32.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW |
| OnvoL9085 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW |
Polestar 3 111 kWh has 28 hp more than Onvo L90 85 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Onvo L90 85 kWh and Polestar 3 111 kWh: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft |
| OnvoL9085 kWh | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb |
| OnvoL9085 kWh | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| OnvoL9085 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 5.0 s |
| OnvoL9085 kWh | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Polestar 3 111 kWh and Onvo L90 85 kWh: 0.9 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| OnvoL9085 kWh | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| OnvoL9085 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OnvoL9085 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar3111 kWh | OnvoL9085 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 490 hp 365 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb | 2,320 kg 5,115 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 3 111 kWh
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 440 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 54 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Onvo L90 85 kWh
- Is 350 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Polestar 3 111 kWh
Onvo L90 85 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
Polestar3111 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)AMG EQE 43 100 kWh
OnvoL9085 kWhvsTeslaModel Y JuniperFacelift 2025Long Range 79 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron114 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ8 e-tron Sportback114 kWh
OnvoL9085 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 500 125 kWh
OnvoL9085 kWhvsAUDIE7X100 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDIe-tronS 95 kWh
OnvoL9085 kWhvsAUDIQ8 e-tronedition Dakar 55 114 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsTeslaModel YLong Range 80.5 kWh
OnvoL9085 kWhvsPolestar3111 kWh
Polestar3111 kWhvsAUDISQ6 e-tron100 kWh
OnvoL9085 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)Facelift 2023GLS 580 V8