Polestar 3
Car comparison
Polestar 3 111 kWhvsOnvo L60 60 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOnvo L60
60 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Polestar 3 111 kWh
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful490 hp365 kW
- Highest torque840 Nm620 lb-ft
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Onvo L60 60 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Lightest1,970 kg4,343 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk495 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Polestar3111 kWh | OnvoL6060 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 490hp365kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 840Nm620lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 1,970kg4,343lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 51.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 32.8s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.5s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 184hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,900mm193in | 4,828mm190in |
| Width | 2,120mm83in | 1,930mm76in |
| Height | 1,627mm64in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,985mm118in | 2,950mm116in |
| Front track | - | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,677mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 484L | 495L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,411L | 1,505L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Polestar3111 kWh | OnvoL6060 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.5 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW |
| OnvoL6060 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW |
Polestar 3 111 kWh has 28 hp more than Onvo L60 60 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Onvo L60 60 kWh and Polestar 3 111 kWh: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft |
| OnvoL6060 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb |
| OnvoL6060 kWh | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| OnvoL6060 kWh | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 5.0 s |
| OnvoL6060 kWh | 4.6 s |
Although Polestar 3 111 kWh has more power, Onvo L60 60 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Onvo L60 60 kWh and Polestar 3 111 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| OnvoL6060 kWh | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh | 490 hp 365 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| OnvoL6060 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW | 4.6 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polestar3111 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OnvoL6060 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Polestar3111 kWh | OnvoL6060 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 490 hp 365 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 840 Nm 620 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,670 kg 5,886 lb | 1,970 kg 4,343 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 484 L 17.1 cu ft | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Polestar 3 111 kWh
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 400 Nm more
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Onvo L60 60 kWh
- Is 700 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























