Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
Nissan Murano II (Z51) · Facelift 2010 3.5 V6vsVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan I · Facelift 2011
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Lightest1,598 kg3,523 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Highest torque334 Nm246 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range774 km481 mi
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 249hp186kW | 211hp157kW |
| Torque | 334Nm246lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,598kg3,523lb |
| Gross weight | 2,365kg5,214lb | 2,210kg4,872lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 91.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 75.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.8s Calculated | 40.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 774km481mi Calculated | 753km468mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,860mm191in | 4,426mm174in |
| Width | 1,885mm74in | 1,809mm71in |
| Height | 1,720mm68in | 1,703mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,825mm111in | 2,604mm103in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,571mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 178mm7in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 402L | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 248g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 5,300-6,200 rpm | 1,700-5,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.8 s | 40.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has 38 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 38 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 8.0 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 7.8 s |
Although Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI and Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 774 km 481 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 753 km 468 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 249 hp 186 kW | 8.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.8 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanMurano II (Z51)Facelift 20103.5 V6 | VolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 249 hp 186 kW | 211 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 334 Nm 246 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 774 km 481 mi | 753 km 468 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 248 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6 | Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 14.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 2,231 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan Murano II (Z51) Facelift 2010 3.5 V6
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 54 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 21 km (13 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tiguan I Facelift 2011 2.0 TSI
- Is 232 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























