Volvo S70
Car comparison
Volvo S70 2.3 TurbovsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y33)
3.0T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,473 kg3,247 lb
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Most powerful270 hp201 kW
- Highest torque368 Nm271 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 368Nm271lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,473kg3,247lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | - |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | - |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | - |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 has 20 hp more than Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6.7 s |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 7.0 s |
Although Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 has more power, Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 18 Nm more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























