Car comparison

Volvo S70 2.3 TurbovsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S70

2.3 Turbo

250 hp2319 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan1996-2000
VS

Nissan Cedric (Y33)

3.0T V6

270 hp2987 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan1995-1997

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,473 kg
    3,247 lb
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Most powerful
    270 hp
    201 kW
  • Highest torque
    368 Nm
    271 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    172 hp/t
    128 kW/t
    5.8 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    72/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS702.3 TurboNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
250hp186kW
270hp201kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
368Nm271lb-ft
Curb weight
1,473kg3,247lb
1,570kg3,461lb
Gross weight
1,920kg4,233lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
236 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
66.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
20.7s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
620km385mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,319cc142cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,720mm186in
-
Width
1,760mm69in
-
Height
1,390mm55in
-
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
-
Front track
1,520mm60in
-
Rear track
1,470mm58in
-
Ground clearance-
145mm6in
Trunk volume
470L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S70 2.3 TurboNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS702.3 Turbo6,000 rpm2,400 rpm6,250 rpm
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V66,000 rpm3,600 rpm6,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS702.3 TurboNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
20.7 s
25.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
236 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
168 km/h
104 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS702.3 Turbo
250 hp
186 kW
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 has 20 hp more than Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS702.3 Turbo
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
368 Nm
271 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS702.3 Turbo
1,473 kg
3,247 lb
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
1,570 kg
3,461 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS702.3 Turbo
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
236 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS702.3 Turbo6.7 s
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V67.0 s

Although Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 has more power, Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo and Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS702.3 Turbo
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS702.3 Turbo
250 hp
186 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
270 hp
201 kW
7.0 s
236 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS702.3 Turbo
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,720 mm
185.8 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
270 hp
201 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS702.3 TurboNissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
270 hp
201 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
236 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,473 kg
3,247 lb
1,570 kg
3,461 lb
Fuel consumption
-
12.9 L/100 km
18.2 mpg US
21.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
470 L
16.6 cu ft
Length
4,720 mm
185.8 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Range score
-
620 km
385 mi
Trunk score
470 L
16.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
172 hp/t
128 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi36.33 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,386 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo

  • Is 97 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 24 km/h (15 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power

Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 18 Nm more
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo vs Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster