Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Cayman (987C) · Facelift 2009 R 3.4vsNissan 370Z 3.7
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 370Z
3.7
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed282 km/h175 mph
- Most powerful330 hp246 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score81/100
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Best estimated range679 km422 mi
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | Nissan370Z3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 330hp246kW | 328hp245kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,496kg3,298lb |
| Gross weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,800kg3,968lb |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 279 km/h / 173 mph Calculated | 68.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.2s | 18.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 557km346mi Calculated | 679km422mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 3,696cc226cu in |
| Length | 4,347mm171in | 4,250mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,550mm100in |
| Front track | 1,490mm59in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,595mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 103mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 235L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4: Power / Torque
- Nissan 370Z 3.7: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 7,400 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,650 rpm |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | Nissan370Z3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.2 s | 18.0 s |
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 330 hp 246 kW |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW |
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4 has 2 hp more than Nissan 370Z 3.7.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 370Z 3.7 and Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 1,496 kg 3,298 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 5.0 s |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4 and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4 and Nissan 370Z 3.7: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 557 km 346 mi |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 679 km 422 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 330 hp 246 kW | 5.0 s | 282 km/h 175 mph |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 328 hp 245 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Nissan370Z3.7 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z3.7 | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4 | Nissan370Z3.7 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 330 hp 246 kW | 328 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 282 km/h 175 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,496 kg 3,298 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 557 km 346 mi | 679 km 422 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 235 L 8.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4 | Nissan 370Z 3.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.97 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,546 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayman (987C) Facelift 2009 R 3.4
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 7 Nm more
- Is 201 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Nissan 370Z 3.7
- Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























