Tesla Model X
Car comparison
Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWhvsNIO EL7 75 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNIO EL7
75 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score0/100
NIO EL7 75 kWh
- Most powerful653 hp487 kW
- Lightest2,346 kg5,172 lb
- Best power-to-weight278 hp/t208 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | NIOEL775 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 611hp456kW | 653hp487kW |
| Torque | - | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,562kg5,648lb | 2,346kg5,172lb |
| Gross weight | 3,120kg6,878lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 31.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 30.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.4s Calculated | 19.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 238hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated | 278hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,036mm198in | 4,912mm193in |
| Width | 1,999mm79in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,720mm68in |
| Wheelbase | 2,965mm117in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,705mm67in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,710mm67in | 1,672mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 223mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 357L | 570L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,166L | 1,545L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | NIOEL775 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.4 s | 19.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 130 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW |
| NIOEL775 kWh | 653 hp 487 kW |
NIO EL7 75 kWh has 42 hp more than Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh and NIO EL7 75 kWh: 42 hp (31 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 2,562 kg 5,648 lb |
| NIOEL775 kWh | 2,346 kg 5,172 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NIOEL775 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 2.9 s |
| NIOEL775 kWh | 3.9 s |
Although NIO EL7 75 kWh has more power, Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh and NIO EL7 75 kWh: 1.0 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| NIOEL775 kWh | 278 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | 611 hp 456 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| NIOEL775 kWh | 653 hp 487 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NIOEL775 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel XPerformance 100 kWh | NIOEL775 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 611 hp 456 kW | 653 hp 487 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,562 kg 5,648 lb | 2,346 kg 5,172 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 238 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 278 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model X Performance 100 kWh
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
NIO EL7 75 kWh
- Has 42 hp more
- Is 216 kg lighter
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 213 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























