Volkswagen Beetle (A5)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSIvsMini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
JCW 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,345 kg2,965 lb
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range821 km510 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
- Largest trunk330 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,345kg2,965lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.6s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 821km510mi Calculated | 595km370mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,278mm168in | 4,124mm162in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,486mm59in | 1,527mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,537mm100in | 2,596mm102in |
| Front track | 1,578mm62in | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,544mm61in | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 136mm5in | 107mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 905L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 184g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.6 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI has 2 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 224 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 821 km 510 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 595 km 370 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.9 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)2.0 TSI | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 224 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 821 km 510 mi | 595 km 370 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 184 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI | Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) 2.0 TSI
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 226 km (140 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























