Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDIvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III

RS 2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedHatchback2013-2017
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

Cooper S 1.6

190 hp1598 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,064 km
    661 mi
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184hp137kW
190hp142kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,390kg3,064lb
1,380kg3,042lb
Gross weight
1,932kg4,259lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
88.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
83.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
34.3s
Calculated
41.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,064km661mi
Calculated
734km456mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,685mm184in
4,114mm162in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,449mm57in
1,518mm60in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,595mm102in
Front track
1,535mm60in
1,531mm60in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,558mm61in
Ground clearance
128mm5in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
590L
330L
Max trunk volume
1,580L
1,080L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
50L
47L
CO2 emissions-
148g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDIMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.65,500-6,500 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.3 s
41.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
1,380 kg
3,042 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI7.9 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.67.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
1,064 km
661 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
734 km
456 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
7.9 s
230 km/h
143 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,449 mm
57.0 in
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
7.9 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDI
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.6 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,390 kg
3,064 lb
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
Fuel consumption
4.7 L/100 km
50.0 mpg US
60.1 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,685 mm
184.4 in
Height
1,449 mm
57.0 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in
Range score
1,064 km
661 mi
734 km
456 mi
CO2 score
-
148 g/km
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDIMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.23 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.24 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used705 L186 US gal155 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,234 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI

  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 329 km (205 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 260 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 10 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

RS 2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
RS 2.0 TDI
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIvsSeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
RS 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIvsMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
RS 2.0 TDI
1.6 T-GDI
VS
SkodaOctavia IIIRS 2.0 TDIvsHyundaii30 IIFacelift 20151.6 T-GDI
Skoda Octavia III RS 2.0 TDI vs Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster