Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDIvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III

2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedHatchback2013-2017
VS

Mini Paceman (R61)

Cooper S 1.6

190 hp1598 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    228 km/h
    142 mph
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,020 km
    634 mi
  • Largest trunk
    590 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184hp137kW
190hp142kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,388kg3,060lb
1,380kg3,042lb
Gross weight
1,973kg4,350lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
84.5s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
31.6s
Calculated
41.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton
Calculated
174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,020km634mi
Calculated
734km456mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,659mm183in
4,114mm162in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,786mm70in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,518mm60in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,595mm102in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,531mm60in
Rear track
1,512mm60in
1,558mm61in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
590L
330L
Max trunk volume
1,580L
1,080L
Doors
5
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
50L
47L
CO2 emissions-
148g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDIMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.65,500-6,500 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.6 s
41.6 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 6 hp more than Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
1,388 kg
3,060 lb
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
1,380 kg
3,042 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
228 km/h
142 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI7.1 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.67.6 s

Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
1,020 km
634 mi
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
734 km
456 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
7.1 s
228 km/h
142 mph
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.1 s
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDI
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.6 s
Top speed
228 km/h
142 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,388 kg
3,060 lb
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
590 L
20.8 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,114 mm
162.0 in
Height
1,518 mm
59.8 in
Range score
1,020 km
634 mi
734 km
456 mi
CO2 score
-
148 g/km
Trunk score
590 L
20.8 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III 2.0 TDIMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI

  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 286 km (178 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 260 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Is 8 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 Sportback (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIvsAUDIA3 (8V)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (5-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TDI
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIvsSeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TDI
Cooper S 1.6
VS
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIvsMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
B 220
VS
SkodaOctavia III2.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W246)Facelift 2014B 220
Skoda Octavia III 2.0 TDI vs Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster