Seat Leon III
Car comparison
Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDIvsMini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,370 kg3,020 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,190 km740 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.7s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 83.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.6s Calculated | 41.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,190km740mi Calculated | 734km456mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,271mm168in | 4,114mm162in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,444mm57in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,634mm104in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | 1,534mm60in | 1,531mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,558mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,210L | 1,080L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.6 s | 41.4 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has 6 hp more than Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 7.5 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.6 s |
Although Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 1,190 km 740 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 734 km 456 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI |
| 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon IIIFR 2.0 TDI | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.2 L/100 km 56.0 mpg US 67.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,190 km 740 mi | 734 km 456 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.2 L/100 km56 mpg US67.3 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.35 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.83 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 630 L166 US gal139 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,103 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III FR 2.0 TDI
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 456 km (283 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
- Emits 39 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























